Jackson’s Parrot

Reynolds v. United States

admin — Sun, 03 Sep 2023 10:45:00 +0000

This week’s religious freedom case is one near to my experience as a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the “Church”). Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a statute that restricted the free exercise of religion by Mr. Reynolds. At the time, some members of the Church were engaged in the practice of polygamy, and Mr. Reynolds was being tried criminally for so doing. The opinion of the Court glosses over many procedural and due process errors committed by the prosecution, any number of which would be fatal to a criminal prosecution today, in order to get to the finding that the Court wanted to make, to wit: that the federal government had the power to infringe on the religious practices of a persecuted and marginalized minority adhered to, simply due to the government’s dislike of that practice.

The post Reynolds v. United States appeared first on Jackson's Parrot.

Permoli v. New Orleans

admin — Sun, 27 Aug 2023 09:27:00 +0000

Today’s case, Permoli v. New Orleans, 44 U. S. 589 (1845), deals with a city ordinance which required all funerals to be performed at a specified “obituary chapel” rather than at individual houses of worship. The case text does not specifically identify why this restriction was imposed, nor does it identify who was entitled to benefit from such an undertaking. But, a certain Roman Catholic Priest, Bernard Permoli, officiated in funeral services for a Mr. Louis Le Roy (deceased) in the Roman Catholic Church of St. Augustin in New Orleans. The penalty for this infraction was a fine of $50.00, which Father Permoli refused to pay despite admitting that he had performed the funeral in question at his parish church rather than at the Obituary Chapel.

Father Premoli argued that this requirement impermissibly restricted the free exercise of his religion and of that of his parishioners. He prevailed at the trial court level, but the Louisiana State appellate court found this lacking. As a result he sought a ruling from the US Supreme Court.

His appeal did not help. The Supreme Court, as courts often do, took as their first step of the analysis to examine whether they had jurisdiction to address the question at issue. They decided that they did not. “The Constitution makes no provision for protecting the citizens of the respective states in their religious liberties; this is left to the state constitutions and laws.” Id. at 609. The First Amendment of the US Constitution simply did not apply to state governments and laws, and did not protect the citizens of Louisiana from state laws that might have otherwise been obstinate to the rights and privileges that the First Amendment sought to protect.

Of course, those of you with a view to the present state of things will recognize that this distinction no longer applies, and the 14^th Amendment extended Constitutional protections to everyone, but that is for a future post.

The post Permoli v. New Orleans appeared first on Jackson's Parrot.

The Power to Destroy

admin — Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:09:54 +0000

It is an often stated maxim that the power to tax is the power to destroy. The national Canadian government seems not to understand this. A recently passed law requires Facebook (and other similar companies) to make payments to Canadian news organizations if the site allows links to those sites in Canada. So, for instance, if Facebook allows a link to a CBC news story about western Canada’s wildfires, Facebook would be required to pay certain cash renumeration to the CBC due to Facebook supposedly benefiting from such content.

Only, it seems that Facebook would rather just ban links to Canadian news organizations, and Justin Trudeau is not amused. He complains that Facebook is choosing “corporate profits” over the safety of Canadian citizens by limiting the amount of news that Canadians are exposed to on social media. This makes little to no sense because if Facebook was making so much money on linking to news articles, they would still come out on top after making these payments to the CBC and others.

It should also be noted that the largest news organizations in Canada are government owned and would be the largest recipient of such payments.

Leftists, like Trudeau, like to live in a world where basic economic laws do not exist. If you make something more expensive than it’s worth, people won’t buy it. The Canadian government made news links in Canada more expensive than they are worth, and so Canadians will miss out entirely.

Like I said at the start, you can tax something out of existence. The leftists seem to want to do this with oil and guns, but act completely flabbergasted when they break other things they want to milk through confiscatory policies.

The post The Power to Destroy appeared first on Jackson's Parrot.